Users of common manufacturers like Kodak, Sony, Olympus, and Fujifilm can expect to restore most of their data.įor the video recovery challenge, Disk Drill again produced excellent results.

And of those file types, Stellar’s performance gave mixed results. In comparison, Stellar Data Recovery only worked with 21 out of the 37 RAW photo file types we tested. x3i, but the overall results are nonetheless highly impressive. And for the file types Disk Drill supported, it restored most of our data.

It only missed 3 out of 37 file types specifically, it missed. Here’s the verdict:įor RAW photo recovery, Disk Drill is better. We divided the challenge into document, video, and RAW photo recovery. Do note that as of this writing, Disk Drill is offering licenses for both the Windows and Mac versions for the price of one.įor the real-life recovery challenge, we tally up how much data our featured software can restore according to commonly used file types. The Windows version of Disk Drill does not support EXT4, HFS+, and APFS formats, which is not important for this review. This was the case with all the partitions we tested including non-Windows-based formats. In fact, we couldn’t come up with conclusive data because it kept crashing! When it didn’t crash, it was able to restore some files – but we can’t judge it properly because the results were too inconsistent.

Unfortunately, the same can’t be said about Stellar Data Recovery. It was able to restore the folder structure and file names of our Windows-based FAT32, exFAT, and NTFS partitions, and it recovered most of our files as well. Most data recovery software offer this feature but not all of them do it well.ĭisk Drill is one of the rare apps that produce consistently positive results. Aside from recovering data, a deep scan also attempts to restore a drive’s root folder structure and original file names.

Disk drill pro vs expert vs enterprise